A person's worth nowadays seen to be judge according to social status and material possessions .old fashioned values, such as honour, kindness and trust no longer seen important. To what extent agree or disagree?
Today, this argument is true, that ancient cultures qualities does not matter for long ago like; honesty and kind-hearted and hope. Whereas the individual judged to way of social standard and dressing sense as well as expressing inspiration. I agree to this staenent, because money and time convenience were major factor in disappear old materials.
At the first glance, people were investigate to social behavior as well as new fashion trend whereas, at the previous time, the individual emitting crucial factor such as; honourable and good moral values. Due to this reason, most individual under the effect of achieving higher status in the society . To prefer money is highly effective for people to change their psychology . For instance, the Hindustan time was conducted survey found that in the 21st century 8 out of ten were relocate to self-respect and kindness in the community so that, people show interest to acquire a quite few of economy.
Secondly, in the current situation show that person have been lack of time because, they were busy in the hectic schedule like royal family and celebrity and so on which is also effecting towards encourage money and show self- behaviour for other. Hence, loss a lot of honesty with each other. Crime is good illustration of this is, most people show selfless to acquire property anyone.
To conclude, no doubt, at the present time most people were show keen interest to represent their status that's why, a truth is mitigate and soar- up greediness in the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al behavior as well as new fashion trend whereas, at the previous time, the indiv...
^^
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...f achieving higher status in the society . To prefer money is highly effective for...
^^
Line 3, column 378, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ve for people to change their psychology . For instance, the Hindustan time was co...
^^
Line 3, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tan time was conducted survey found that in the 21st century 8 out of ten were re...
^^
Line 3, column 485, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'relocated'.
Suggestion: relocated
... in the 21st century 8 out of ten were relocate to self-respect and kindness in the com...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...keen interest to represent their status thats why, a truth is mitigate and soar- up g...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'mitigated'.
Suggestion: mitigated
...sent their status thats why, a truth is mitigate and soar- up greediness in the world. ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for instance, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1274.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05555555556 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58358923784 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 394.2 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.7741590252 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.818181818 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9090909091 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0856522517992 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310289897699 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289952797475 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0513511434987 0.151304729494 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266691598479 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.