The pie chart below shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years.
The pie chart depicts the information about the proportion of five types of energy in the France in 1995 and 2005.
It is clear from the chart that, energy produced by coal comprised of 29.80% in 1995 which showed a slight 1% of increase in 2005. However, in 1995 gas generated 29.63% which rose marginally to 30.31% 10 years later.
In addition to this, there was an about 5% growth in production from both nuclear power and other sources to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. Whereas, petrol was the only source of energy which decreased in production from 29.7% in 1995 to around a fifth (19.55%) in 2005.
Overall, in both years the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted for over half the production of energy , while, nuclear and other kinds of energy siurces generated the least amount of energy in France. In all types of energy production there was only minimal changes over the 10 year period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...urces to 10.10% and 9.10% respectively. Whereas, petrol was the only source of energy w...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accoun...
^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...the most significant sources of energy were gas and coal, which together accounted ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d for over half the production of energy , while, nuclear and other kinds of energ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 3.0 24.0651302605 12% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 1615.20841683 48% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 163.0 315.596192385 52% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8036809816 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 4.20363070211 85% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40978664689 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 176.041082164 51% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552147239264 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 506.74238477 43% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 16.0721442886 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.268112799 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.857142857 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199763243731 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985432627459 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660077571922 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130594034707 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0579093194653 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 50.2224549098 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 78.4519038076 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.