Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many leisure activities definitely exist for a fleeting moment, whereas others appear to be popular over the course of time. I partly agree with the idea that these hobbies demonstrate trends rather than our compassion.
There are many trendy activities which children and adults enjoy doing in their free time. Men and women in today’s society, for instance, are obsessed with what their peers take part in, such as fitness training and doing yoga. These activities may have some minor benefits, but the spread of them mainly stems from the craze sweeping through our community. In a similar way, there have been some ephemeral trends amongst the children, such as fidget spinner, Rubik’s cube, and squidgies. I doubt whether the majority of the population continued to enjoy those leisure activities in the long term.
In contrast to the trends mentioned above, some hobbies and interests are acknowledged to be timeless, and they do not reflect a temporary movement. Chess which has been existing for many centuries epitomises this statement. An overwhelming number of children, adults or even senior citizens are pursuing this sport. It is not the popularity, but the absorbing playing style and unique strategies which have been making players passionate about throughout history. Chess will absolutely thrive and remain perennially popular in the future. The same could be applied for a range of other activities like reading and swimming.
In conclusion, some leisure activities are momentary and others are timeless. The view which these hobbies indicate trends and fashions rather than genuine interests is not an accurate argument under any circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 365, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "In a similar way" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...e craze sweeping through our community. In a similar way, there have been some ephemeral trends ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44106463878 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71223422461 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623574144487 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3517011456 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.86666666667 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203155885379 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0596063915328 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653286885656 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124590324226 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266305951489 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.