At present, the media affects people’s lives significantly.
What impact does this have on society? Is it a negative or positive development?
Nowadays, media has developed at an unprecedented rate. Which impacts people’s lives in different ways. This essay will outline some issues of media in our lives and explain why the media’s development has a negative one on life.
The rise of media around the globe such as internet applications has been affecting the quality of time. Most people spend a lot of time in front of their mobile phone screens without felling of time. For example in 2018, a study has been published by the New York Times newspaper reported that 80 percent of community members spend 40% of their daily time on social media.
The negative outcome is that media is slowly killing real activism and replacing it with slacktivism. Moreover, it creates a great gab between family members. In addition to, media sharing has encouraged public to use computers and mobile phones to express their concerns on social issues without actually having to engage actively with others in real life, which is against societal norms. For instance, research from a societal magazine in 2019 showed that the gab among family members was increasing by 30% from 2017 to 2018. As almost a quarter the world’s population is now on Facebook.
In conclusion, the power of media has shifted the balance from the hands of a few to the masses. Therefore, the media’s drawbacks effect on our social and ethical behaviour. It is recommended that we should be aware of the disadvantages of the media as well as its merits in order to raise our community standards.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...velopment has a negative one on life. The rise of media around the globe such ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98062015504 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73923534071 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.5571932921 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231112147242 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807205698647 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766955298888 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145330161547 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126626111413 0.056905535591 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.