At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?

It is always a major issue about the ratio of a country`s population, in terms of race, fortune, as well as the age distribution. At present, young adults account comparatively more than older ones in some countries, which i think has both positive and negative sides.

With larger percentage of young adults, a country will definitely benefits in ecnomic development. A state`s economy depends on people`s contribution to various industries, to some extent, especially young people in basic jobs which experienced generation would not consider. To earn a good future, freshmen concentrate more on their work with continuous studying skills. Meanwhile, young adults are more prone to spend their money, offering inner motives to economy. For example, people in china of their 20s or 30s tend to use more than half of their salary to satisfy themselves.

Furthermore, young people are more keen to see the change of their world. If then government has plans to implement reform policies, it will be welcomed by young adults but probably receives boycott from old generation that holds traditional opinions. Bases on this different views of society, young people are more likely to built a friendly relationship with other countries with more open mind.

However, there are weakness with smaller number of older people. The rights and social cares might be overlooked because of the portion of its population. It is likely that the rate of unemployment would rise to a new level since too many young graduates compete for limited positions.

To conclude, despite the possible drawback of the situation, i tend to hold the opinion that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...han older ones in some countries, which i think has both positive and negative si...
^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h other countries with more open mind. However, there are weakness with smaller...
^^^
Line 9, column 62, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...the possible drawback of the situation, i tend to hold the opinion that the advan...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, then, well, while, for example, i think, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30740740741 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94792712739 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651851851852 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9974488866 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.357142857 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20175795629 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0678360581893 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695115528838 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10246594333 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026842244358 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.