Currently, the masses of young adults are largely greater than the number of older peoples of some countries. Although it has some advantages and disadvantages, in my opinion, advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, having lots of young people helps to develop a country because young peoples are enthusiasm to fulfill their goal using their energy and current technology. They participate in challenging works, for instance, making a start-up which could have bright future or not. But, older peoples dare to take these kinds of risks in the case of stability and security. However, there are some drawbacks of having larger number of young people such as lack of opportunity of their employment which can lead them to engage with crime.
On the other hand, to give proper guidelines older people play a vital role to take forward a society, culture and technology. Older people share their experiences of failure from which younger can learn not to make the same mistakes again. Besides, experienced peoples are needed to give directions to younger about their ideas and innovations. Generally, young adults take a decision without anticipating the consequences of their work. In this case, older peoples always take decision wisely by considering all positive and negative result of that decision.
In conclusion, notwithstanding huge population of younger comparing with older people can have some disadvantages, the advantages of it obviously exceed the disadvantages. And it can be more fruitful if fledgling young peoples are guided by the experienced older people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 562, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e and negative result of that decision. In conclusion, notwithstanding huge popu...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...guided by the experienced older people.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4314516129 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93313170118 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584677419355 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.9204394312 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.615384615 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195672251307 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751807671031 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642624096408 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146857862333 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741569828111 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.