Currently, the masses of young adults are largely greater than the number of older peoples of some countries. Although it has some advantages and disadvantages, in my opinion, advantages outweigh the disadvantages.
Firstly, having lots of young people helps to develop a country because young peoples are enthusiasm to fulfill their goal using their energy and current technology. They participate in challenging works, for instance, making a start-up which could have bright future or not. But, older peoples dare to take these kinds of risks in the case of stability and security. The majority of youth is involved in IT area, finance and entrepreneurship. Maintaining sustainable development in these fields ensures the prosperity of country and wealth of nation. However, there are some drawbacks of having larger number of young people such as lack of opportunity of their employment which can lead them to engage with crime doing socially prohibited works.
On the other hand, to give proper guidelines older people play a vital role to take forward a society, culture and technology. Older people share their experiences of failure from which younger can learn not to make the same mistakes again. Besides, experienced peoples are needed to give directions to younger about their ideas and innovations. Generally, young adults take a decision without anticipating the consequences of their work. In this case, older peoples always take decision wisely by considering all positive and negative result of that decision.
In conclusion, notwithstanding huge population of younger comparing with older people can have some disadvantages, the advantages of it obviously exceed the disadvantages. And it can be more fruitful if fledgling young peoples are guided by the experienced older people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47670250896 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01758484066 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0076379773 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.866666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204445493115 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068316295937 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643501006438 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149255452641 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729190995686 0.056905535591 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.