Prevention is better than cure. Researching and treating diseases is too costly, so it would be better to invest in preventive measures. To what extent do you agree
It is often believed by some people that preventing diseases from occurring is of more benefit to human than treating them and I strongly agree. Providing funds for disease prevention is more cost effective and will help eradicate some serious diseases.
Firstly, preventing disease requires little amount of money compared to its treatment. In other words, money that will be use to treat one ailment would have been beneficial in preventing not just the disease itself but also others from occurring in the first instance through the practice of vaccination. For instance, treating a new born child that is suffering from tuberculosis will require a good some of money as against preventing it from the onset by simply vaccinating the child which is done free of charge. Thus, it is more economical to prevent the occurrence of diseases than treating it.
Secondly, vaccination as a way of preventing ailments, has helped eradicate some epidemic diseases. This is to say that if more funds are Channelled to disease prevention buy procuring more vaccine and getting more persons to benefit from it, many ailments suffered in the past will continue to be a thing of the past. Polio for example, which is disease that many persons in Nigeria suffered in the 20 century, is now a forgotten issue all thanks to Nigerian government for providing funds to procure polio vaccine.
In conclusion, without doubt, it is more profitable to prevent diseases rather than treating them. This is because disease prevention will require minimal income and also has alleviated people of twenty one century from suffering the same fate as our forefather by merely getting vaccinated .
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ive and will help eradicate some serious diseases. Firstly, preventing disea...
^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ent. In other words, money that will be use to treat one ailment would have been be...
^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...ent. In other words, money that will be use to treat one ailment would have been be...
^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...would have been beneficial in preventing not just the disease itself but also oth...
^^
Line 5, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers from occurring in the first instance through the practice of vaccination. Fo...
^^
Line 5, column 279, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...occurring in the first instance through the practice of vaccination. For instanc...
^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: BUY_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'by'?
Suggestion: by
...ds are Channelled to disease prevention buy procuring more vaccine and getting more...
^^^
Line 13, column 197, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-one
...ncome and also has alleviated people of twenty one century from suffering the same fate as...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 291, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... forefather by merely getting vaccinated .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16483516484 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71400367965 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545787545788 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8084568488 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.181818182 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8181818182 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4545454545 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.01903807615 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203566971268 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104675121025 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534709159727 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144521678428 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393571086846 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.