Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high-tech media such as software, videos or DVDs. Do you agree or disagree?

Although public libraries has been the store house of centuries of knowledge collected to educate the people about the inventions, historical events as well as unique ideas, however, with the advent of the 21st century, digital media has become the main source of storing these information. Even though, expensive equipment might be necessary to stop data as soft-copy or digital copies but recently this form of technology has become cheaper than hard-copy of the same materials. Hence, I disagree with the statement and would like to justify my argument in terms of cost and flexibility of electronic media.

Votes
Average: 2.2 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this information' or 'these informations'?
Suggestion: this information; these informations
...a has become the main source of storing these information. Even though, expensive equipment might...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, well, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 4.0 24.0651302605 17% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 41.998997996 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 521.0 1615.20841683 32% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 98.0 315.596192385 31% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31632653061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.14634628365 4.20363070211 75% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70875606756 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 176.041082164 42% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.755102040816 0.561755894193 134% => OK
syllable_count: 166.5 506.74238477 33% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 3.0 16.0721442886 19% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8048567762 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.666666667 106.682146367 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.6666666667 20.7667163134 157% => OK
Discourse Markers: 15.0 7.06120827912 212% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.38176352705 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0710791753799 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439620536142 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0177841794789 0.0667982634062 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0710791753799 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.056905535591 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.17 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.19 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 78.4519038076 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 22.4719101124 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.