Q3 : Human activities have negative effects on plants and animal species. Some people think that it is too late to do anything about this problem. Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Recently, the impact of human activities on animals and plants has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that if human beings make an effort, they are able to prevent living creatures, including animals and plants, from disappearing, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I wholeheartedly agree with the former stance. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, those who claim that people cannot make it possible for animals and plants not to become extinct do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that human beings have exploited a myriad of natural habitats for themselves without taking into account environmental degradation. As an illustration, a natural heritage site designated by UNESCO in South Korea had various endangered species of birds in 2010. However, according to an article released by the Seoul Times, approximately 70% of these species died out in 2015, and it turned out that the main reason for this phenomenon was a huge amount of garbage generated by a large number of travellers which posed a threat to the local environment.
My opinion, however, is that mankind is capable of keeping biodiversity. Perhaps the most compelling reason is that not only are a multitude of governments across the globe investing a vast sum of money in order to mitigate global warming doing harm to animals and plants, but they are also implementing numerous campaigns so as to warn of the dangers of the extinction of animals and plants. In addition, individuals can play a vital role in the protection of animals and plants. To provide a hypothetical example, if plenty of everyday people participate in recycling, an astronomical quantity of domestic waste would be reduced, which would enable both animals and plants from living a longer life. In light of the above, I find these more persuasive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every sector of our society makes a concerted effort, human beings are able to conserve numerous species of animals and plants for the reasons discussed above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 654, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...s a huge amount of garbage generated by a large number of travellers which posed a threat to the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...re also implementing numerous campaigns so as to warn of the dangers of the extinction o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a careful manner" with adverb for "careful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, I fully support the view that if every...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as to, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1905.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1072386059 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84915589933 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58981233244 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 614.7 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.5594465959 49.4020404114 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8666666667 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.53333333333 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24513743664 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711239257304 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495775716226 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148421826288 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384875124727 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.