In this modern world, there are variety of educational and practical methods to promote skill and creativity. Some people believe that academic forms of teaching like being in universities is inappropriate approach for learning and being a prosperous person, while others disagree with this idea. In my opinion, student's attending in academic venues through the learning basic knowledge should be performed but it would not be enough and there should be some others ways for promotion pupil's capabilities.
To begin with, academic institutions are places where pupils have opportunities to learn primary theories of different sciences that they have no information about. However, with this development of technology, there are numerous valid websites and apps which can be profitable method for learning. But there are some drawbacks of reading from internet that may cannot be replaced. Firstly, in colleges and schools, students have straight relationship with tutors and others who have same purpose. In this case, face to face connection and team working are the most significant of academic experiences to develop the skills. Secondly, all types of pupils required to be instructed especially about initiate lessons which are important. Also, formal educational places provide this ground for them.
On the other hand, for growth of creativity and ability, universities and other genres of educational places are not enough because of some reasons. In fact, success is a sophisticated issue that every person can achieve it if pupil be an industrious person and improving the knowledge. It would depend on how students can analyze and grow the information that they have learnt. Furthermore, number of achievements depend on practical knowledge that without experiences and hardworking, it would be impossible to improve them. Therefore, there should be combination of abilities and learning to attain the prosperity.
In conclusion, for being a successful person, there are diverse steps to carry out and academic institutions cannot be the merely method to improve the abilities. But it would be the ideal factor to promote the basic knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'purposed'.
Suggestion: purposed
...ip with tutors and others who have same purpose. In this case, face to face connection ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 554, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
...mprove them. Therefore, there should be combination of abilities and learning to attain the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48048048048 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93504179292 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534534534535 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1073818159 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.352941176 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5882352941 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.94117647059 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242868743727 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762473371628 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618560636763 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164833170036 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484370651378 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.