railways or roads
transport systems have always been major concerns of governments, especially in large cities. some people believe that investments in transportation ought to be done on railways compared to roads' construction. I agree with this idea, and I think that expanding railways is better and more economical than roads.
One of the advantages of railways is their reliability. there are fewer accidents and unpredictable events on transports based trains or subways. For example, when we are driving own vehicles, we will encounter various risks like other drivers' faults, our carelessness, or roads' problems. On the other hand, the trains' schedules are regular. Passengers are likely to experience fewer human mistakes on their trips. The other positive point of using railways is that these are more environmental-friendly and generate less amount of pollution compared to a huge number of cars. The more usage of railways, the less amount of pollutant emissions into the atmosphere. For instance, hybrid and electric trains are brilliant examples which are useful alternatives to petrol-based machines which are making traffic jams on roads.
However, there are drawbacks that inhibit people from using railways. some countries have not expanded their infrastructures well to make trains as a convenient choice for transport. In these cases, persuading people to their own cars is a difficult task. these governments should strive more to develop their systems. The other factor that motivates people to use their cars is not being cheap and not accessible to public transportation. For example, in megacities, you may have to spend a long time to get work while using railway transport. Here, the government should spend more money on railways so that people find it much easier than using private cars.
In short, I believe that railway expansion has lots of merits for us and future generations. it is a less risky way for transport, while simultaneously can help us to conserve our surroundings more efficiently. so, it is much reasonable that government spend money on improving this system beside existing roads.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Transport
transport systems have always been major concerns...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...overnments, especially in large cities. some people believe that investments in tran...
^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...tages of railways is their reliability. there are fewer accidents and unpredictable e...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 71, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...hat inhibit people from using railways. some countries have not expanded their infra...
^^^^
Line 9, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... to their own cars is a difficult task. these governments should strive more to devel...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f merits for us and future generations. it is a less risky way for transport, whil...
^^
Line 13, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...erve our surroundings more efficiently. so, it is much reasonable that government ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1798.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38323353293 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06160380111 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574850299401 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9851059022 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.619047619 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9047619048 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193810977629 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550688945828 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815391262896 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130126410994 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0742546514443 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.