Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
To maintain human brain more active, there are several typical activities to do such as reading books or watching TV. Some say that reading books has several benefits to human brain compared to watching films which only decrease the use of imagination. I completely agree with this statement.
For over centuries, books have been considered as the main source of information to challenge one's mind. Firstly, by reading novels written by famous compelling writers, such as William Shakespeare, we can imagine the appearance of the patronages quite differently. For example, Romeo and Giulietta, the couple are well-known for their bravery actions to achieve common goals, are well-written in book; therefore numerous readers around the world enjoy this book. On the other hand, most film producers have depicted these personages and the plot several times, and many people, hence, can consume them quickly. However, after watching it they are reluctant to read books in order to imagine it themselves. This will definitely lead to the passive activity of human brain.
In addition, some scientists suggest that imagination is the key to the improvement of memory. Many people read books, especially novels in order that retell them in more interesting way, and they primarily rely on their imagination to do so. Nevertheless, by watching movies, this skill is rarely used, and as a result, retelling might not be neatly as expected.
In conclusion, although watching TV and films helps to obtain information in a short time, it hardly benefits to the increase of imagination, which can be only developed by reading books. In doing so, in my opinion, there would be an improvement in brain activity, as well as in the storytelling skill of people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 314, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...as in the storytelling skill of people.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20848056537 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82457947273 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60777385159 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0199782416 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.285714286 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2142857143 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7142857143 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250077988543 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892724072235 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561549255009 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146855183351 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659527655807 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.