Reading books keeps a person’s mind active, whereas watching films and television is passive and does not require a person to use their imagination.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
To maintain human brain more active, there are several typical activities to do such as reading books or watching TV. Some say that reading books has several benefits to human brain in contrast with watching films which only decrease the use of imagination. I completely agree with this statement.
For over centuries, books have been considered as the main source of information to challenge one's mind. Firstly, by reading novels written by famous compelling writers, such as William Shakespeare, we can imagine the appearance of the patronages quite differently. For example, Romeo and Giulietta, the couple are well-known for their bravery actions to achieve common goals, are well-written in book; therefore, numerous readers around the world enjoy this book. On the other hand, most film producers have depicted these personages and the plot several times, and many people, hence, can consume them in a couple of hours. However, after watching it they are reluctant to read books in order to imagine it themselves. If they do so regularly, there is an evidence that imagination is barely developed in their brain activity.
In addition, some scientists suggest that imagination is the key to the improvement of memory. Many adults have a tendency to read various types of books, such as fairytales in order that retell it to others, especially younger generation in a more interesting way, and they primarily rely on their imagination to do so. Nevertheless, while they are watching movies, this skill is hardly used, and as a result, retelling might not be neatly as expected.
In conclusion, although television and films often stimulate to obtain information in a short time, it is less likely to benefit to the increase of imagination, which can be only developed by reading books. In my opinion, reading is a more active process that exercises the mind, encourages a stronger sense of imagination.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elling might not be neatly as expected. In conclusion, although television and f...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19032258065 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87282469848 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8386034165 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.928571429 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.2857142857 7.06120827912 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260840968981 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924377054574 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553653114229 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153308960408 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636257889642 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.