In the recent years car ownership has been increasing rapidly throughout the world.
Illustrate the problem created by this trend. What solution can government bring out to solve these problems?
Living in the twenty-first century with tough competition and with more luxurious life demands of more and more things are increasing. People compete with each other in each sector whether it is in business or in the field of lifestyle. They owned many houses and vehicles only to show. In the recent years car ownership has increased so rapidly which is being perturb.
To begin with, increment in the some car ownership is being the national matter of concerned. This problem is devolving the daily life of common people as it creates traffic jam voraciously. In addition to this, increasing in number of car is also a hindrance for public vehicle owned by government as state would not run the system smoothly. It will make the nation quandary whether to give service or not.For prototype, in the context of Nepal, nation is providing municipality bus to serve citizens. If species are not ecstatic towards this service, then the state will cut the martial and it will affect employe humankind too. Furthermore, government should divide the extra budget for develope roadways to decline the gluttonous traffic jam.
On the flip side, state can make vigorous policies against this trend of owning car. It can increase the tax of private vehicles for demoting this tendency. Country should develop other means of transportation too, because people usually own car as faster means of transport. There are plethora of solution that government can fixate on. If it is possible, then government can make method that people should make a group of suitable number to buy a car or a private vehicle which will be very suitable for the country like Nepal which should import petroleum element. It will be the historic solution if momentum was provided to the people to use public vehicle and not the private one which will the major step to cut the traffic jam. For instance, if people were provided with advanced public vehicle who will own the private vehicle?
To wrap up, every tendency has both problems and solutions. If the knot is left wheel of a cart, then the clue is the right wheel of same cart. So, the problem should be overcome with the handsome solutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'years'' or 'year's'?
Suggestion: years'; year's
...nd vehicles only to show. In the recent years car ownership has increased so rapidly ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...urb. To begin with, increment in the some car ownership is being the national mat...
^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: increasing
...c jam voraciously. In addition to this, increasing in number of car is also a hindrance for public v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...quandary whether to give service or not.For prototype, in the context of Nepal, nat...
^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overcome'?
Suggestion: overcome
...of same cart. So, the problem should be overcome with the handsome solutions.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, then, for instance, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 369.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89159891599 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5250356657 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525745257453 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3507785397 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.45 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179081770081 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633851687457 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654856638622 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101602541586 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0214834352229 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.