It is true that the family structure and roles have changed recently. I believe the changes are completely positive and this trend can benefit both family units and society. I will discuss my point of view with multiple perspectives.
Initially the main advantage is the nuclear families that have become increasingly prevalent with the average three and four members in each unit while in the traditional families there were at least eight people under the same roof. This modern trend has enhanced the lives of families and has made strong bonds between parents and children. They also nurture their child and spend more time with him. Also they come close to each other. Another advantage of modern family is the equal position of women at work place after marriage. Nowadays they have the same opportunities to enter the labour force and give an equal responsibility to their husbands for upbringing their children.
In the traditional families men were considered as breadwinners and had all the financial burden on their shoulders. Now this trend has been changed and women can equally help her family financially and lessen the problems that were occurred in the past. Moreover she can fulfill her dreams and can become a leader of her family. I believe these changes bring many benefits to a household. Admittedly the small size of family is ideal for nurturing children and promote family connections. They live in a warm and friendly environment. Also , equality between genders has encourage women to pursue their career aspiration with many job opportunities.
In conclusion the modern family structure has improved the lives of people. I believe this trend has proven to be very effective and has lead many families to successful and healthy lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt of view with multiple perspectives. Initially the main advantage is the nucl...
^^^
Line 2, column 406, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...eir child and spend more time with him. Also they come close to each other. Another ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usbands for upbringing their children. In the traditional families men were con...
^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...roblems that were occurred in the past. Moreover she can fulfill her dreams and can beco...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...in a warm and friendly environment. Also , equality between genders has encourage ...
^^
Line 3, column 576, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'encouraged'.
Suggestion: encouraged
...nt. Also , equality between genders has encourage women to pursue their career aspiration...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...spiration with many job opportunities. In conclusion the modern family structur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, moreover, so, while, at least, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10380622837 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65080025159 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0404824766 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9444444444 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0555555556 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 7.06120827912 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234761271984 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803016357005 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810836000502 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162385970156 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565770105764 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.