In recent years, more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper books. Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
As electronic gadgets are becoming increasingly popular among the millennials, people are opting for electronic books rather than traditional printed books. This essay will first discuss some demerits associated with this trend and will then argue why the pros overshadow the cons.
To begin with the negatives, using electronic book readers for longer durations may weaken the eyesight of users'. This is because these devices emit harmful radiations, also known as blue light radiation, which can cause short-sightedness among its users. In addition, the people who are employed in the printing presses might lose their jobs as digital libraries may replace printed books in the future. For instance, in many developed countries such as Canada, America and Australia printing presses are struggling to make ends meet as the demand for printed material has decreased significantly.
However, these cons pale in comparison to the pros that electronic books bring. Firstly, digital information does not require any physical location in order to be stored and recorded. To exemplify, an amazon kindle, a seven-inch device, can store thousands of books and still can be carried anywhere without any hassle. Secondly, the manufacturing of printed journals or novels requires papers which obviously lead to deforestation whereas electronic books are eco-friendly. Finally, one can access electronic information at the touch of a button; on the other hand, books can only be obtained either by visiting a library or by shopping from a book shop.
To conclude, even though digital books may affect the printing industry, the ability to readily access information at the touch of a button and being an environment-friendly, indeed, outweigh all the drawbacks.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50184501845 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01354720481 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1301659128 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8333333333 7.06120827912 196% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103939784857 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398342281746 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424034411497 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648738734046 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246108643242 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.