Research indicates that the characteristics we are born with have much more influence on our personality and development than any experiences we may have in our life.
Which do you consider to be the major influence?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The features a person gained inherently play a vital part in the personality and growth of a person. A study disclosed that inborn traits are more influential than any other experiences of life. So, I believe although features from ancestors manipulate the children yet life teaches us abundant of things which are not attributed to the person's family.
In life, an individual goes through a lot of phases, some might be easiest and others could be toughest. What influences a person most is in which atmosphere and neighbourhood one is residing. If a person is living where no rules and regulation are followed, one must react and respond to things accordingly forgetting the attributes one got from their mothers and fathers. By the time the feature and the way the neighbourhood react, adopted by the particular person living in. For example, a study revealed that masses who live in a bad company of individuals are more likely to be influenced by them, such as gamblers.
If I talk about the features with which one came into this world. These features matter but in certain circumstances where ethics and regulations are being followed by the people. To make it clear, a child born in a gentle and innocent family, along with that one was obedient of their parents. He followed the footsteps and the ethical teachings of their father lead one towards the bright future.
To conclude, I am of the opine that the atmosphere in which a child grows will be featured in life later on. However, if a child follows the the commandments of their caretakers, although he is living in a bad environment, will result in a positive way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 338, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... things which are not attributed to the persons family. In life, an individual goes ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nfluenced by them, such as gamblers. If I talk about the features with which on...
^^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... bright future. To conclude, I am of the opine that the atmosphere in which a child gr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e later on. However, if a child follows the the commandments of their caretakers, altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e later on. However, if a child follows the the commandments of their caretakers, altho...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 236, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...iving in a bad environment, will result in a positive way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1359.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83629893238 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80697432738 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.2658469195 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.0714285714 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 7.06120827912 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151550108116 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056039772476 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408295813772 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885763475687 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415298978922 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.