In recent times, due to the significant impact of the coronavirus, most people have to do their job through online platforms. As a result, there was a considerable number of businesses which/that decided to train their employees and meet each other online. While it can be argued that there are more advantages than disadvantages, I believe that the drawbacks account for the most.
On the one hand, working online has some positive influences that bring several conveniences for meetings, discussions, or even training. First and foremost, time-saving is the most beneficial factor for people who work from home; for instance, the appointments will take place more promptly and efficiently, despite the location of the participants. Moreover, the ability to connect within the business would be increased through virtual meetings. By that, individuals can share their documents or show their slides clearly so that all the given information will be particularly understood.
On the other hand, those virtual meetings and training caused a lot of problems with attendance. It will discourage real interaction with each other; from that point, some people might find it difficult to express their words and ideas, and also, the diplomatic issue could happen. Furthermore, the security is not a hundred per cent ensured; for example, the users of those virtual meeting apps might get in trouble with having data stolen by hackers. In addition, many people who are not computer literate would be in trouble. Besides that, the loss of traditional cultures will be more and more. In detail, face-to-face meetings will decrease day by day because of modern technology, leading us to an online environment.
To sum up, although there are a few benefits of this issue, it brings downsides regarding online meetings and training. I firmly believe that the disadvantages affect the meeting participants and also the company outweigh the advantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...ncements permits our quality of life is more easier. Individuals and companies tend to use ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1276.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 232.0 315.596192385 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95888140882 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.681034482759 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.7252346352 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.1538461538 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8461538462 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0421352579211 0.244688304435 17% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0135549488991 0.084324248473 16% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258466183688 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0357254036983 0.151304729494 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0225491480882 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.