Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Today's world has been witnessed a controversial discussion regarding the role of governments and large companies in protecting the Earth's ecosystem. While some people agree only those mentioned parties have a vast impact on environmental improvement, I believe individuals also get involved in this progress as protecting the environment is not a solo career.
Undeniably, most governments nowadays have imported stricter policies and punishments on preventing environmental devastation by a gradual decrease in fume emission or a slight increase in the number of rainforests. For example, European countries have already signed collaboration contracts in which they agreed to limit the amount of CO2 released into the atmosphere. Another example is Scandinavian nations encourage their citizens to use public transports for commuting. Consequently, it is not abnormal if a tourist sees numerous people cycling around Stockholm city or walking with their bikes in the parks near the Copenhagen area.
As the environment has become a hot pot globally, large corporations have been made huge differences in environmental protection through several campaigns towards sustainable development. The truth is that people's awareness is heightening day by day, and their concerns about environmental conservation have become more robust and more specific. Therefore, consumers tend to support businesses generating social values, including preserving surrounding areas. For instance, Uniliver creates its campaigns focusing on manufacturing organic products and better manufacturing machines to lessen the amount of disposal waste.
Last but not least, environmental policies cannot be done without participation from individuals. Specifically, a no-plastic waste policy is hard to be done if citizens cannot recognize the harmfulness of using plastic products. Similarly, if a person is aware of garbage classification, companies can save time gathering waste for the recycling process. Thus, individual involvement does count in the process of protecting the ecosystem.
Shortly, improving the environment cannot be determined only by the role of governments or big companies. Instead, this comes from a solid collaboration of all relevant parties, including individuals, for a better living planet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.98484848485 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35733644263 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660606060606 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0418663284 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.4375 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124988051146 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369529910466 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046335624088 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0686108377997 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0388540868235 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 50.2224549098 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.75 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.