Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, some businesses tend to use the Internet to create some online meetings, online discussions, and online training. In my opinion, the creation some online chatting rooms has its both positive and negative effects, and the benefits of it can overshadow the negative effects of the one.
To begin with, it is clear that online activities are beneficial for some businesses. Firstly, members, who are working in the same company, can discuss their ideas and exchange some essential information via the Internet much faster and much more effective than meeting face-to-face. Therefore, people might finish more work, which requires plenty of time and several discussions among people. Moreover, thanks to the development of the Internet, people do not need to head out. Individuals, thus, can save their moving time and their transportation money.
However, online activities also have negative effects. Firstly, regarding the Internet, people sometimes cannot use some online methods to pass and receive some ideas, opinions, and some influential information among people, who are working in the same workplace. Therefore, members in the same company can miss many influential information, which is obvious a hazardous situation. Moreover, people can lose their attention while they are working thanks to some disturbing things, such as pop-up advertisements, exciting games, or interesting videos. Therefore, their work efficiency and their work quality will decrease.
To sum up, I believe that the advantages of online activities can outweigh the disadvantages of ones in some companies because some chairmen can decline some consequenses of disadvantages through checking the work quality of employees or giving some rewards if employees work hard.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 312, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much influential information', 'a good deal of influential information'.
Suggestion: much influential information; a good deal of influential information
...e, members in the same company can miss many influential information, which is obvious a hazardous situation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63157894737 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91983069244 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582706766917 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.9969488918 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116793044991 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430155383922 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0415579467207 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821319279762 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034209251367 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.