Responsible tourist could preserve both the local culture and environment Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Responsible tourist could preserve both the local culture and environment. Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Tourism is an important aspect for people in any country. Few people believe that there will be no responsible tourists in the society, whereas conservation of native culture and environment can be done by them. In this essay I completely agree to responsible tourists can preserve them by protecting them.

Perhaps the most compelling reason why responsible tourists preserve their culture and environmental is because they know the value of it.They understand their significance and they could spread to other countries through technology. If they elaborate their preserving methods, then there will be increase in awareness to protect. There will be more resources available, and a bolster from government could provide.

Although, the spreading of their importance not be viewed in isolation. Another particularly essential part of responsible tourist is following the government rules. A set of rules for any land is cornerstone for the nation. These rules can guide to hordes of people. By this there will be increasing in jobs for local people. These all will be result in economy growth,then the government release funds to conserve the culture and environment, to deal things by their own, to live happily in their respective locations.

However, few people thinks the responsible tourists has been vanished from the society. There is also irresponsible tourists who does not care about anything. They think they do not belong there. In the recent Gazette the hindu, there is an article about irresponsible tourists throwing futile things everywhere. By seeing this article culture and environment leads to deteriorating, dangerous and even more damaging.

In conclusion I strongly agree the responsible tourists could safeguard. By knowing the importance and following the rules,that would lead to keep clean culture and green environment .

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ourism is an important aspect for people in any country. Few people believe that ...
^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: They
...al is because they know the value of it.They understand their significance and they ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ter from government could provide. Although, the spreading of their importance not ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 370, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , then
...ese all will be result in economy growth,then the government release funds to conserv...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 123, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
...g the importance and following the rules,that would lead to keep clean culture and gr...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 183, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...keep clean culture and green environment .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, whereas, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53846153846 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9974190357 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552447552448 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7084150357 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3684210526 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0526315789 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338941304765 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101447371222 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0853545170565 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193790762966 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451415914357 0.056905535591 79% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.26 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.