Responsible tourists could preserve both the local culture and environment. Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree
There is a common belief that indigenous culture and environment could be conserved by well-mannered tourists, while others hold the view that being a responsible visitor is impossible. From my perspective, there are both positive and negative impacts of this issue.
On the one hand, there are some advantages for the native culture and nature that are needed to be concerned about. Firstly, local culture is protected and developed by responsible tourists because of donating and ameliorating. For instance, Bat Trang village is a traditional village in Vietnam for making and trading hand-made potteries but it has been modified currently with some modern constructions due to the support of tourism. Secondly, occupational opportunities also are created in terms of services for the locals and they have the responsibility to preserve cultural specificity through the enhancement of tourism. As a consequence, the local life will be improved and get better and their awareness will be raised.
On the other hand, irresponsibility happens with some people and almost unable to change. First and foremost, despite mandatory regulations, tourists still do whatever they want and break the rule. For example, chewing gums and littering are banned in a cleaned city such as Singapore but some reverse actions occurred under the laws. Furthermore, understanding completely about one’s culture is not always possible because some specific information sometimes is not found on the internet. If a visitor came to a region and infringe local rules, native people would not feel welcome and comfortable.
To sum up, responsible tourists play an important role in cultural development and conserving the environment by supporting and creating more chances for the areas but knowing totally about the regulations is not possible in some situations. Personally, through visiting places, raising awareness of local region where they are visiting are necessary in order to improve tourism around the world.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1615.20841683 64% => OK
No of words: 188.0 315.596192385 60% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51063829787 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 4.20363070211 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00956675916 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.68085106383 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 333.9 506.74238477 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1928903964 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261151081337 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900855897429 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673965196064 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154729135585 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328791058923 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.24 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.