Tourism industry throughout the world is concerned with investment in new avenues such as roads and modern buildings as well as rehabilitation of old edifices. I completely agree that authorities must preserve the old edifices as they are of immense cultural importance and also serve as a significant source of income for the government.
To begin with, historical structures are the face of any culture. To elaborate, it not only allows people to relate to their cultural identity but also provides them a chance to go back to their roots and explore their historical background. To exemplify, the taj mahal is such a monument which enables us to have an insight into the Mughal rule and the architecture it brought with it. Moreover, such an erection adds to the beauty of the environment and also acts as a recreational spot for the masses who can spend their time here for relaxing themselves from the stressful lives they lead.
Moving further, the renovation of an old edifice requires skilled craftsmen to be commissioned for the job which acts as an employment opportunity for them who otherwise would have either indulged in criminal activities or starved themselves. Furthermore, when the refurbishment of such a structure is complete, it acts as a humongous source of income for the government. To elaborate, if a restored building is opened for the public, the government can charge a certain amount of ticket fees and add to their wealth. To illustrate, over a year ago, the restoration of fort gobindgarh in Amritsar was completed and was opened for the public to visits at some price. This in turn, promotes tourism.
To conclude, the task of restoring old buildings should be undertaken but the government with full swing as it is extremely beneficial not only for the public but also for the government itself.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nd explore their historical background. To exemplify, the taj mahal is such a monu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01307189542 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9636541229 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571895424837 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.4899890871 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123938972452 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0476293186756 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536274963538 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955122470899 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594594665101 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.