In this fast paced world, career always takes precedence while health occupies the backseat. Some people believe that the most suitable way to improve the level of health is by increasing the number of sports facilities while others consider that this would have little influence on public health and that other steps are required. This essay would analyze both aspects before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
Beyond doubt, there are several benefits to indulging in sporting activities. Most of the outdoor and indoor sports require physical effort and this in turn makes a person active and flexible. This definitely helps to better the physical body. To illustrate, a person indulging in regular sports is bound to be fitter than a person who does not participate in any major physical activities or sports. In addition to that, playing a sport benefits the mental health and keeps a person agile and active in their thinking. Thus, we can see why some people are of the view that playing sports is the most ideal way to attain balanced health.
On the contrary, even if sport centers are erected, the main problem is that people lack the time to visit them due to their hectic work schedules. To illustrate, an IT expert who works in a metropolitan city and leaves his office at around 7 in the evening and reaches his home an hour or two later, cannot be expected to take some time out to visit a sport centre. Moreover, sports would only be beneficial if there is an expert who is able to coach the masses and the number of such people in low in country like India. To elaborate, only a master would know the ins and outs of a particular sport and be able to teach it proficiently. Otherwise, if the people play without guidance, it can result in various physical problems like sprains, twisting of body parts among other things.
To conclude, there are convincing arguments both to support and refute the view that increasing sport facilities can improve the level of health. As far as i am concerned, increasing these facilities would have tangible effect on the public health, but other steps are required.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
...r hectic work schedules. To illustrate, an IT expert who works in a metropolitan city...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... improve the level of health. As far as i am concerned, increasing these faciliti...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, thus, while, in addition, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82465753425 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50551802363 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531506849315 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4157146946 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0625 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322946039159 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104555077936 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108439344805 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223221252059 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119054833419 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.