Rich countries often give money to poorer countries, but it does not solve poverty. Therefore, developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid.To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Poverty is a biggest issue in many countries. Although many well-off countries have provided hafty money to developing countries to fight against the poverty, situation is not changed much. Lots of experts have said that merely financial support is not enough, back-end help is also essential. I agree with this view and will discuss in the following paragraphs.

Uncontrolled corruption is the primary reason of this deplorable condition. many selfies and unethical government employees are not only dishonest with the job, but encourage the bribe culture in government sector. As a result, the money which has released from central government for poor people is not reached to them. Not only the corruption, sometimes, lack of financial management knowledge also become a reason of waste of money. government employees at lower level is not enough smart or extremely educated to use released fund wisely. This problem mainly occur in small town or village where the poverty is very high. For example, fund allocated for farmers to improve their farming techniques usually wasted because of neither farmer nor government sector employees aware about technology.

Considering these reasons, financial help alone will not change situation for many decades. However, corruption is an internal issue, other countries investigation Agencies must be involve themselves in probing of scheme or fraud in which their money invested. by doing this, corrupted people afraid and think twice before doing corruption next time. Apart from this, proper training and technology sharing with inhabitants also put money in right direction. If someone knows about technology and how to use it then he can use financial aid to update themselves. These type of training or technology interchange will create new employment in future.

In conclusion, as poor countries are suffered from their internal issues such as poverty and corruption, financial help only definitely not change anything for them.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
Poverty is a biggest issue in many countries. Althou...
^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
...ry reason of this deplorable condition. many selfies and unethical government employ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...also become a reason of waste of money. government employees at lower level is not enough ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... corruption is an internal issue, other countries investigation Agencies must be involve ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s investigation Agencies must be involve themselves in probing of scheme or fraud...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: By
...or fraud in which their money invested. by doing this, corrupted people afraid and...
^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g corruption next time. Apart from this, proper training and technology sharing w...
^^
Line 5, column 642, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... interchange will create new employment in future. In conclusion, as poor countries ar...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48208469055 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75358956903 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609120521173 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7530973839 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0555555556 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162640122105 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460626625588 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503988597493 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113000711892 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0542474701429 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.