Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
All the government wants a stable economy for their country. With that, they also want decrement in the unemployment rate and increment in the lifestyle of people. There are some advantages and disadvantages to migrate skilled and knowledgeable people from foreign countries.
In terms of advantages, the country and government both get rich with skilful and knowledgeable people. With the help of them, they can solve any problem with an effective solution. They can introduce policies that attract foreign investors. If the government get foreign money, then ultimately the GDP of their country will increase. Locals get jobs due to the investment of foreign companies in production plants and factories.
In terms of disadvantages, the government has to provide basic amenities like food, house, and transportation services. If a skilled person gets a job in a foreign country that means one person from that country loss his/her job and becoming unemployed. Also, if that foreign employee does not have a permanent resident of that country then he/she will send all the extra money that they saved to their native country. That way money and the economy will decrease for that country. On the other hand, if the government provide them permanent residence then population and pollution rate will increase. For example, United America accepted too many skilful people’s emigration request that in today’s condition native people of USA are unemployed and crime rate are also gradually increase in last 10 years.
In conclusion, I totally disagree with migrating skilled person from poor countries, rather than rich countries government have to invest to develop their country's people skills and knowledge.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...n from poor countries, rather than rich countries government have to invest to develop th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42379182156 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86585034778 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.550185873606 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.8416473084 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2666666667 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206675471024 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679304122744 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817098230188 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147951773647 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744922443544 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.