With the rise in modernisation a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in jungles to take first steps on the moon. Nevertheless they have some issues which remains unchanged and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should be necessary to take robots in their work or not? I completely agree with the statement and explore the various aspects in the following paragraphs.
The first step is to understand why this is happening. Broadly speaking, there are many reasons for this. The first and foremost is time saving. When the human is used to robots in life, and their life would be become essay. Furthermore, robots are doing work easily, and have more engergetic power. Hence, robots quickly finished the work. So, human saved more time from robots.
Apart from that most of the people robots used in office because in office have more work. Therefore, high authority takes most important place in life. One of the causes of this could be more accuracy and efficiency which human takes work from robots. So many people used the robots in office. They take works without mistakes.
In conclusion, there are two factors are available on robots positive, and negative. But the positive efforts are more. So, many people use the robots in life.
With the rise in modernisation a man has transformed his life tremendously. He has progressed from walking barefooted in jungles to take first steps on the moon. Nevertheless they have some issues which remains unchanged and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic asserts that should be necessary to take robots in their work or not? I completely agree with the statement and explore the various aspects in the following paragraphs.
The first step is to understand why this is happening. Broadly speaking, there are many reasons for this. The first and foremost is time saving. When the human is used to robots in life, and their life would be become essay. Furthermore, robots are doing work easily, and have more engergetic power. Hence, robots quickly finished the work. So, human saved more time from robots.
Apart from that most of the people robots used in office because in office have more work. Therefore, high authority takes most important place in life. One of the causes of this could be more accuracy and efficiency which human takes work from robots. So many people used the robots in office. They take works without mistakes.
In conclusion, there are two factors are available on robots positive, and negative. But the positive efforts are more. So, many people use the robots in life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ungles to take first steps on the moon. Nevertheless they have some issues which remains unc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s which remains unchanged and as complex as ever. For instance, the given topic a...
^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...part from that most of the people robots used in office because in office have mo...
^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y people used the robots in office. They take works without mistakes. In concl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, hence, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, apart from, broadly speaking, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 1615.20841683 68% => OK
No of words: 222.0 315.596192385 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96846846847 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49628000158 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581081081081 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 506.74238477 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 11.0 20.2975951904 54% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6190600998 49.4020404114 48% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 55.15 106.682146367 52% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 11.1 20.7667163134 53% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 3.4128256513 352% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342114883475 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10084360808 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14168721021 0.0667982634062 212% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223746303688 0.151304729494 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255929839844 0.056905535591 450% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.5 13.0946893788 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.31 50.2224549098 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.36 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.4 10.1190380762 63% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.