Rising University fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Unemployment of youth is one of the major concerns of 21st century. People are not getting jobs that matches with their academic background. We can see many graduates searching for jobs. It is clear that lack of qualification is not the problem, increasing competition is the real issue. Some people believe that instead of teaching arts subjects like history and philosophy, more practical degree courses should be offered so that employment can be maximized. However, I cannot completely agree with this statement.
It is a misconception that students pursuing arts subjects will eventually become jobless. Although there are plenty of opportunities for graduates in history or philosophy, in most cases, students lack the right skill to take up the job. The curriculum should be modified in such a way that students acquire the capacity to practicalize the knowledge they have gained.
Another aspect of the considered problem is that learning a practical degree course will not guarantee a job. Practical knowledge without understanding the basic theory is sometimes useless. Also, the youth must be open minded to accept all kind of works, because every job has it's own reputation and value. Dedication and hard work will always reward you with progress.
To conclude, if you excel in what you learn, you will never be left unemployed. It doesn't matter what course you study, the world will never run out of opportunities. Even though our society is a challenging place to actualize someone's dreams, if you have the confidence to think of a startup business, chances are that you will succeed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'minded accepting'.
Suggestion: minded accepting
...s useless. Also, the youth must be open minded to accept all kind of works, because every job ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
..., you will never be left unemployed. It doesnt matter what course you study, the world...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, kind of, in most cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1348.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18461538462 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86558853172 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.921794525 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.25 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8125 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155409010918 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0443335452637 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618100109157 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894015243531 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585433579815 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.