For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is claimed that teachers have more influence on children’s intelligence and social development than their parents. Although this proposal seems reasonable, I strongly disagree that I would contend that the parents have more impacts on both the social and intelligence of the youngster.
There are two compelling evidences prove that children’s intellectual reply on their parents. First, the children will be clever and smart or not will completely depend on their parents through genes. In fact, it is rarely that both father and mother are foolish but their children are genius. Another reason is homeschool parents can dedicate most of their time to providing high-quality and meticulously planned lessons, so the children would be able to progress at their own pace. In addition, the study habit of the young is created in their formative years by the simulation and teaching of their family.
For the perspective of social growth, I think the parents also play a integral part of this area since children usually are the copy of their parents’ behaviours and personalities. It means that they have a tendency to study their parents’ treatment with others or their parents’ habit and apply these into their life. For instance, if the parents have habit that talking about their day, their work in meals, their children will have the same habit in the future. Therefore, the parents’ behaviours affect their children a lot, sometimes just through some simple things like their treatment to waiters can change their children personality.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that parents play a critical role in terms of cultivation of an academically and socially successful child than teachers
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l growth, I think the parents also play a integral part of this area since childr...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1447.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30036630037 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80440670438 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6772941896 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.583333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.549221253665 0.244688304435 224% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.228964731468 0.084324248473 272% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114027117246 0.0667982634062 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.319835709835 0.151304729494 211% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133346377713 0.056905535591 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.