Technology in the field of medicine has grown tremendously, and as a result, scientists were able to predict the future behavior of a person by studying his / her brain at a very young age. Undoubtedly, such studies would make a considerable contribution towards creating a crime-free society in the future. I completely agree that offensive behavior is an innate quality and could be phased out through certain measures, which I will explain in this essay.
Although in some cases people are forced by the external factors such as poverty and illiteracy to involve in unlawful activities, still in most cases it is witnessed to be due to the inborne quality of the person. There are many examples of highly-qualified and affluent people indulging in criminal activities, which clearly proves that they are motivated to commit crimes because of their propensity. Some politicians, for instance, are highly educated and have abundant power and wealth, but still often involve in corruption as they could not control their desire towards money.
Certainly, if scientist could predict these offensive qualities in a child at a very young age, his / her parents could nurture him / her in a better way. They could decide on the type of education the child requires so that he /she could forestall from involving in illegal activities in the future. Furthermore, parents might instill a fear in children about the legal consequences of committing crimes, thereby alleviating their desire towards crime. As these measures could help in creating more law-abiding citizens in the future, the chances of people involving in crimes could be greatly reduced.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that human nature determines crime as most people commit crimes due to their personality traits and desire. If these qualities, however, are predicted at a younger age in a person, he/ she could be made a better citizen through proper education.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, still, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in most cases, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22186495177 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87996713844 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.14861373 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0833333333 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126880865238 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0464097411866 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0247025453946 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0756605244279 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148700069577 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.