Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree?
People hold different views about whether scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments or by privately-owned companies. From my perspective, I completely agree with the first point of view that scientific research should be funded and supervised solely by the state.
On the one hand, privately-run companies argue that they are willing to undertake scientific research; however, there are two potential dangers in this. First and foremost, the ultimate aim of private-own companies is maximizing profits; therefore, many corporations intentionally alter results slightly to serve this purpose. For instance, in my country, there are several scandals about new products being introduced hurriedly after inadequate experiments. This could bring many deleterious influences on the health of customers who consume these products as they might have undesirable side effects. Additionally, leaving scientific research into areas namely genetic engineering in the hands of privately-operated companies may have profound social consequences. In fact, Gm crops with unproven effects could inflict severe damages on the ecosystem.
On the other hand, I support the views of those who believe that governments should be the sole organizations which are responsible for scientific research. Firstly, if governments provide funding and observe scientific research, it seems that we do not have to worry about the safety and effectiveness of new products because governments aim to enhance the standard of living for their residents, not to break into new markets or to gain competitive advantages. For example, any new medicine dispensed by a pharmacy or hospital has undergone rigorous testing that was carried out by the government before reaching the shelves. With this lengthy process of checks and balances, it is unlikely that any medicine could reach the public that was still unsafe. Secondly, given the fact that governments have a profound understanding of the needs of society, they could make wise decisions which is the best way to prioritize expenditure on specific areas of research. One example is the development of renewable energy to meet growing demands.
In conclusion, with all aforementioned reasons, I strongly believe that governments should shoulder all responsibilities for scientific research.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72206303725 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20500907207 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598853868195 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6291088868 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.133333333 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2666666667 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302187659592 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0984570702034 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10965382747 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206645787916 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120459330691 0.056905535591 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.