Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by private companies rather than governments. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages?
In the modern world, people have to deal with a host of issues, including technological development. There is a wide belief that private companies should have more responsibilities in carrying out and managing scientific inventions than authorities. In the scope of this writing, the pros and cons of this trend will be discussed. Although each side of opinion has its reasons and realities, I am still more convinced that the adverse effects of this problem outweigh the benefits owing to the following grounds.
On the one hand, the main benefit of companies' carrying out and controlling research is that they often respond more rapidly to demand than governments. More specifically, some people who invest money in these companies are greedy to make the most of any business opportunity. Thus, vast amounts of money become immediately available for research of these corporations to maximize profits. To illustrate, since the top priority is to earn money, pharmaceutical companies usually have more motivation to conduct medicines or vaccine research more quickly and efficiently.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that the aforementioned advantages are at the expense of greater drawbacks. Firstly, the scientific study of a company is a business secret, whereas the results of inventions should be shared with the public to extend opportunities for numerous further research promotions. Scientific research is conducted and managed by governments can tack the above problem. Besides, unlike private companies, the government usually runs scientific research without profits, such as environmental protection, social equals, vaccines for everyone. For example, the vaccine cost of a private company is usually higher than a government because the government focuses on its people. In contrast, the company focuses on their income rather than helping all citizens. Therefore, it is difficult for most of the poor to access vaccines unless the government carries out and controls them.
In conclusion, despite some positive aspects, I firmly believe that the more harmful elements outweigh them, and the government should have primary responsibilities in research.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, so, still, therefore, thus, whereas, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51796407186 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07953453206 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568862275449 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2855849324 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.1875 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380811240931 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112803022075 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707065714135 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204770872988 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0803927856204 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.