Scientist agree that people are damaging their health by eating too much junk food. Some people think that the answer to this problem is to educate people. Others think education will not work. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this fast-moving world education plays an inevitable role in a person's life. Some researchers support that people spoil their health by consuming fast food. In order to faction of person argue that education is feasible cause to halt this problem while, other believe that it is not work. I will try to throw light upon both view with importance of education. Also, I will try to posit my perspective about it.
To embark on, there are multifarious reason to shore those people who are in favor of education is only way to solve this problem first and foremost, by educating people, some vital information are provided to rise awareness about junk food. Afterwards, people obtain knowledge about fast food and few packaging food contain some dangerous preservation which are mixed by organization to save them for longer time. People have learnt about its detrimental impact if they eat this unhygienic food such as food poison, high cholesterol or blood pressure another reason related if education is offered the knowledge about some healthy food, then people get aware from lot of hygienic food and their importance of vitamins as well as nutrients. Which make them healthier and keep their body fit.
On the downside of spectrum, there are several reason is that education people have enough knowledge about the harmful effect of junk food despite of that people consume it as they do not have enough time in this busy life. Furthermore, people have been attracted by their delicious taste and it's smell compared to inferior taste of hygienic food. Last but not the least, people are facing inflation nowadays hence, some food organizers have been encouraged the people by giving offer. As a result, fast foods are brought by them to protect themselves from inflation.
Aggelomerating, all the point I elaborated an above, it can be conclude that education plays a crucial role to increase the awareness among people. That is why, I support those declaration, which has been associated with education has to provide knowledge about junk food and deduct the use of it. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...education plays an inevitable role in a persons life. Some researchers support that peo...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...I will try to throw light upon both view with importance of education. Also, I wi...
^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun packaging seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little packaging'.
Suggestion: little packaging
...le obtain knowledge about fast food and few packaging food contain some dangerous preservatio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'several reasons'.
Suggestion: several reasons
... On the downside of spectrum, there are several reason is that education people have enough kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 172, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this declaration' or 'those declarations'?
Suggestion: this declaration; those declarations
...ss among people. That is why, I support those declaration, which has been associated with educati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, then, well, while, as to, such as, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00283286119 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6219044739 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552407932011 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.892376085 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4375 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342000692024 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108958466258 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0626311928145 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207993950115 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548827398306 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.