Majority of areas in our planet are explored by people for the sake of science and money. And in recent years, there has been a controversial debate on whether or not people should access those vulnerable regions. In my opinion, to a large extend, believe that it is not beneficial for people to discover susceptible lands.
To begin with, the most important argument is that frequently human activities may pose a threat to a range of species. For example, scientists set up sonar systems in the South Pole and generate the amount of noise which can be heard by marine animals that may affect their behavior patterns, and in particular for migratory fishes.
In addition, it is very difficult to manage tourists’ curiosity which may give rise to irreversible loss. For instance, giving inappropriate foods to mammals which could result in disease, using flashes while they take photos that the instantaneous bright light will stimulus wild life’s eyes and irrigate them. Another point can be made is there are some tourists may go to the remote environment with alien species and bacteria which can be fatally to the native lives. According to the history we can find a number of ecosystem imbalance cases. Such as the wild rabbits intrude Australia and causes local wild herbivore was nearly extinction.
Admittedly, it may be true that conducted researches of the unknown areas has created a lot of benefits not only for individuals but for society as a whole. In other world, studying new knowledge helps us to gain an insight of our earth. Thus we can cope up with global climate changes and make the economic suffering and life loss in control.
Having considered the arguments on both sides of the debate, despite of some advantages that discover far-off lands can brings, I still believe that it is better to limit people to enter those places in order to protect the ecosystem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 153, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...here has been a controversial debate on whether or not people should access those vulnerable r...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...lps us to gain an insight of our earth. Thus we can cope up with global climate chan...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in particular, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.965625 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68602975772 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64375 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2169273843 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0603545646374 0.244688304435 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0167148842336 0.084324248473 20% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249981908245 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0285796604909 0.151304729494 19% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0262878286209 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.