Nowadays, the importance of environmental issues is undeniable for majority of people in all societies. Hence, environmentalists and some other scientists have recommended several environment`s protecting ways to diminish perilous effects of using energy sources on environment during these years. But some people did n`t change their behavior in using energy. There are contingent reasons and solutions in this phenomenon, which will be discussed in detail, followed by my own perspective on this matter.
Many scientists are unanimous in detrimental effects of utilizing energy sources for environment and they consulted to devise some appropriate plans to distribute this tendency between people. Majority of people are reluctant to behave according to these scientists recommendation unfortunately. Comprehensive investigations illustrated several prominent and considerable reasons for this attitude. According to these reports, the first and most important reason of this behavior is the lack of sufficient information among people. According to scientific opinions, the second main reason is the price of energy sources in some undeveloped countries. They insist that because having more quota of natural energy sources in some countries, the price of energy is very cheap in them. Recent published reports in middle east countries revealed that amount of energy consumption in these countries is approximately 3 times more than European countries.
On the other aspect, to control the rate of energy consumption, some energy experts suggested several significant beneficial methods. First of all, they claim that governments and social organizations are the burden of increasing people`s information with some influenced advertisement methods. In their idea, the second solution way for this problem is increasing cost of energy consumption. They emphasize that this method causes to declining the availability of these sources in most countries.
In conclusion, by continuing this rate of energy using in next 50 years we will have several environmental issues undoubtedly. I believe that to control this rate and protecting environment, all distinct beneficiaries such as governments, people and scientists should contribute in solution methods eagerly. I think this collaboration can save our environment from perishing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 255, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'scientists'' or 'scientist's'?
Suggestion: scientists'; scientist's
... reluctant to behave according to these scientists recommendation unfortunately. Comprehen...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, second, so, i think, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.93805309735 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33149765415 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545722713864 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 632.7 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8939390574 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.833333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186350853596 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660634935935 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563765286365 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132593503385 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611074659454 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.83 50.2224549098 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.9 11.3001002004 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.