Scientists and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Governments cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further damage.What are your views? Give

Climate change has already been a major concern of human beings across the globe. Many people think that it is not the authority but individuals should be held accountable for coming up with solutions to alliviate the problem. In my opinion, governments ought to be in partnership with each citizen to tackle this issue.
When it comes to causes of climate change, perhaps the main factor resulting in this phenomenon is people’s awareness. Their activities, namely burning fossil fuels, cutting down rainforests and using pesticides have led to the serious environmental degradation. This has caused a great deal of damage to human beings themselves. Disasters, for example, are happening more frequently than ever before, bringing about massive loss.
To cope with climate change, each person needs to take urgent measures. First and foremost, they should reduce the consumption of non-biodegradable products as much as possible such as using fewer plastic bags and recycling things. Research have shown that plastic packaging takes up to 1,000 years to decompose; therefore, could have a detrimental effect on the environment. For that reason, recycling is an effective method of waste minimisation. Another solution to this problem is that people's commuting to work by public transport instead of private vehicles. It is a common knowledge that CO2 emissions from transportation nowadays have been associated with the air pollution; thus, not only does traveling by a bus save the environment but it also helps to reduce traffic accidents and congestion in rush hours.
Besides citizens'effort, governments had better introduce some coherent policies to involve people in the scheme of preventing the climate change. They possibly enact laws against things injurious to surroundings. By way of illustration, there should be a ban on smoking in public. Stricter punishments like higher fine can be imposed on those who do not comply with the rule. What is more, human beings can also be encouraged to contribute something positive to the society. Organizations as well as campaigns are likely to be launched to persuade them to participate in. Serria Club , for instance, established in 1892, has now become one of the most notable environmental organizations with over 1.3 millions members.
In conclusion, both governments and individuals should make every effort to mitigate the climate change so that they could fully enjoy their life.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 572, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'common knowledge'.
Suggestion: common knowledge
...port instead of private vehicles. It is a common knowledge that CO2 emissions from transportation ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ccidents and congestion in rush hours. Besides citizenseffort, governments had ...
^^
Line 4, column 585, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...uade them to participate in. Serria Club , for instance, established in 1892, has ...
^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... individuals should make every effort to mitigate the climate change so that they...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion, what is more

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2067.0 1615.20841683 128% => OK
No of words: 383.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39686684073 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04081818752 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647519582245 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7770065657 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.4285714286 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2380952381 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47619047619 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187279777794 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0514993523439 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424918601973 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108687496497 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373968397857 0.056905535591 66% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.