It is believed by scientists that the level of intelligence of machines, like computers, will keep on increasing and these machines will be smarter than people. On the positive side, we have numerous advantages of computers, whereas, on the other side, we cannot be completely dependent on these machines as it deters innovation. Both the contrasting views are discussed in this essay, and I opine that keeping the needs of people in mind we should keep on investing in technology and machines.
We cannot deny the fact that computers make human tasks easier, and today we are completely dependent on these machines for our everyday work. With more advancement in technology, these machines can eradicate complex problems from our lives and solve conundrum tasks in a matter of seconds. Furthermore, more research needs to be done to enhance the capability of these machines and shorten their processing times. The benefits of these advancements can be seen in different fields, weather forecasting, for example, where accurate details on weather conditions can be obtained with the help of these useful machines.
The adverse effects of these machines, on the other hand, are often raised by professionals. They believe that the development of computer technology not only deters innovative thinking but it also puts our privacy at risk. We are becoming increasingly dependent on these machines to simplify our tasks and eventually killing creativity. Consequently, we are flooding these machines with all our personal information and risking our private lives. For example, the laptop and mobile phones we use every day capture our personal and other confidential details, these devices can easily be hacked by notorious people to perform illicit activities.
In a nutshell, many individuals, on the one hand, believe that the increasing intelligence of computers is beneficial for mankind as it can eliminate major problems from our lives. On the other hand, some people think that it is a negative development and it is detrimental to our privacy and cognitive thinking. I opine that these advancements are imperative for the constant growth of nations and individuals. Not only will it make human life easier, but it will also help individuals at exploring discoveries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, if, second, so, whereas, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 24.0651302605 204% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20165745856 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86661146839 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472375690608 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 362.0 20.2975951904 1783% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1883.0 106.682146367 1765% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 362.0 20.7667163134 1743% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 93.0 7.06120827912 1317% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199851232019 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.199851232019 0.084324248473 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138030386813 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612121269893 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 184.1 13.0946893788 1406% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -304.41 50.2224549098 -606% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 145.7 11.3001002004 1289% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.36 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 25.56 8.58950901804 298% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 146.8 10.1190380762 1451% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 26.0 10.7795591182 241% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.