Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
It is an irrefutable fact that, technology has gained momentum for the last few decades. Umpteen of scientists expect that in upcoming era machines will be able to drive instead of people. Although, everything has pros and cons, so the same within this case, however, I believe that its merits outweigh its demerits and I intend to support my view in the following paragraphs.
To initiative, undoubtedly, the majority of the work in several sectors are done by computers. Research demonstrates that robots commit fewer mistakes as compared to humans in order to do work, hence, this development will not only reduce traffic congestion but also help to decrease the accidents. Because, of the accuracy of automatically driven cars. Secondly, the necessity of driving licence will be disappeared. Individuals will be able to commute by cars without passing arduous driving tests and paying heavy licence's fee.
Thirdly, in contemporary epoch, majority of the people feel monotonous during driving by themselves, as a result, they cross the adequate limitations of speed, therefore, they will become the victim of reckless accidents, however, the robotic cars will be able to manage speed according to road instructions.
On the other hand, handful of drawbacks cannot be neglected. Firstly, people would not have completely relied on computers driven automobiles. This technique would be perilous due to malfunctioning in computers cars, which can become the reasons for hazardous happens. Furthermore, such cars will not cost-effective, hence ample of aspirants would be unable to purchase these cars.
To conclude, according to the speed of innovations, that day is not so far when such a breakthrough will become ubiquitous among the masses due to its fruitfulness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Irrefutable
irrefutable, technology has gained momentum for the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 300, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ut also help to decrease the accidents. Because of the accuracy of automatically driven...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g tests and paying heavy licences fee. Thirdly, in contemporary epoch, majority...
^^^
Line 9, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...relied on computers driven automobiles. this technique would be perilous due to malf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48351648352 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04594998675 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637362637363 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2481965075 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.928571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64285714286 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198328594256 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640367773079 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443558158821 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939877859622 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463112237607 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.