Should governments spend so much money on space exploration when there are problems on Earth that need to be solved?
These days, exploring outside the Earth has gained a great amount of popularity. In the course of this development, there is some dispute about whether governments are advised to invest big sums on it amid many problems on Earth that need to be dealt with. In my opinion, I suppose that they should focus on solve existential problems successfully before make any space explorations.
This is because it put humans and other creatures at risk before considerable achievements of space exploration are reached. Firstly, in modern society, humans have to face up to a number of problems such as environment, health, crime,...etc, which are all life- death problems, complicated and serious. It cause huge danger to human beings's life and other living things's existence, which even lead to extinction and previous achievements destruction. Meanwhile, if governments waste too much money on space researching, there will not have enough financial conditions to take great measures to solve current issues. What is more, the space exploration profession have no certain potential or future because there have no unequivocal clues or achievements about the new planet or any breakthroughs.
In conclusion, I have a strong belief that governments in countries should concentrate on having solutions to problems on Earth instead of spending an amount of money on space professions
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...blems such as environment, health, crime,...etc, which are all life- death problem...
^^
Line 2, column 307, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'causes'?
Suggestion: causes
...h problems, complicated and serious. It cause huge danger to human beingss life and o...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 426, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'achievements'' or 'achievement's'?
Suggestion: achievements'; achievement's
...ch even lead to extinction and previous achievements destruction. Meanwhile, if governments ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, while, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1161.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 216.0 315.596192385 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.375 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.20363070211 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0964124502 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.648148148148 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 358.2 506.74238477 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4664010614 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325035304701 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116487081814 0.084324248473 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798218581146 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227558527867 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630028934326 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.