Some people believe zoos are good places for people to learn about animals. Other people believe animals belong in nature and it is wrong to keep them in zoos. What do you think? Explain, giving specific reasons for your choice.
we cannot deny that zoos have gained a great amount of popularity so far. However, there is still a dispute about whether it is useful or cruel. Some people suppose that it brings advantages for people's learning about the animals' world. On the contrary, others seem to believe that it is wrongdoing when animals belonging to nature are kept in zoos. Personally, I strongly suppose that zoos are wonderful places for studying.
On one hand, it helps people a lot in exploring and searching for the wild animals' world. Although almost animals' natural habitats are wild woods, people still have opportunities of approaching them regardless of any geographical distances. What's more, it does good a lot to studying some subjects related to animals or ecosystems like Biology. As a result, rather than learning plenty of bookish knowledge at school, students should be allowed to visit zoos as an extracurricular activity to make their learning more visually and interestingly.
On the other hand, some people believe that it is cruel and brutal when keeping animals in zoos. This is because it obviously goes wrong when it forces animals to be separated from natural home and living conditions, their families,...etc. This even leads to causing them some diseases resulting from changes in their habitats. In addition, it seems to be less free, more narrow and cramped for animals to be kept in cages all times.
In conclusion, I have a great belief that zoos are beneficial to us in learning about animals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
we cannot deny that zoos have gained a gre...
^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...gardless of any geographical distances. Whats more, it does good a lot to studying so...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 232, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...me and living conditions, their families,...etc. This even leads to causing them s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, still, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.028 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78639265 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4117475195 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.7857142857 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.422167447733 0.244688304435 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136573448326 0.084324248473 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0962840888129 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235928226617 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0968395743397 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.