The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.
The line graph illustrates the variation in the number of goods transported in the UK over a 28-year period starting from 1979 to 2002 by road, water, rail, and pipeline.
Overall, the quantities of goods carried by these 4 types of transportation were all rise, in which road transport had the swiftest increase and rail one went up at a slowest pace.
In 1979, the figures of commodities transported by road accounted for 70 million tonnes, which was the highest number in 4 types.
The usage of water and rail to carry goods was in a nearly similar point at just slightly below 40 million tonnes. Pipeline transport was at the lowest point, which was 5 million tonnes.
Over the given period, the most significant feature is that the goods road transportation grew enormously and reached a peak at just below 100 million tonnes in 2002, a growth of approximately 30 million tonnes. Commodities carried by water and pipeline also increased considerably from roughly 39 million tonnes to 65 million tonnes, and 5 million tonnes to just over 20 million tonnes respectively. In contrast, there was a meager rise in the usage of rail for transporting goods, rising from below 40 million tonnes to above 40 million tonnes
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 166, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...iftest increase and rail one went up at a slowest pace. In 1979, the figures of...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87980769231 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79057860615 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5336264031 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185523660688 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103766115302 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637873383479 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127760775819 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554009444985 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.