Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Passive smoking is equally injurious as active smoking. Hence, some think that smoking needs to be prohibited in public spaces, which I completely agree because the harm imposed on unintentional smoker due to inhaling someone else’s cigar smoke is unfair. Moreover, the smell of cigar smoke is felt unpleasant generally.
The first reason to support the ban on public smoking is its unfairness in the causation of diseases among non-smokers. It is not uncommon for a smoker to suffer from diseases caused by smoking, and at the same time, it is also not uncommon to witness smoking-related health problems among people, especially children, who never smoke. This is mainly because people inevitably tend to inhale the smoke when someone smokes near them, which can happen, particularly, in public places. A recent study in India found that non-smokers who regularly board train or bus to work from stations that have cigar selling shops around them are at high risk of developing lung cancer than the general public.
The second reason in favour of the public smoking ban is the nuisance it creates for surrounding people. A strong odour is one of the characteristics of cigars’ smoke. Not many non-smokers tend to bear it. However, they are forced to withstand the smell when they are left with no choice while being in important public spots, such as a bus stand or railway station. This can be best illustrated as the choiceless situation of fellow passengers in a single train compartment that is filled with the odour of smoke from a single smoker, which is clearly a public nuisance. Therefore, the ban on public smoking must be upheld by all means.
To conclude, smoking in public places harms people who pass by in addition to the smoker, Also, the strong odour from the smoke irritates the bystanders. Thus, creating a public nuisance which clearly warrants the ban on smoking in public spaces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Passive smoking is equally injurious as ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 680, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...risk of developing lung cancer than the general public. The second reason in favour of th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.065830721 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71935578465 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554858934169 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7144134452 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.733333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2666666667 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357972789971 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135892228945 0.084324248473 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.06997902719 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248271698843 0.151304729494 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320788858369 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.