The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The society would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose, and can even be damaging. Do you agree or disagree?

Advertisement is ubiquitous today. Businessman take help of advertisement to gain their profit of company. In modern era, people get influenced adversely by advert. Some masses believe that prohibition on advertisement which have no moral value and usefulness. I will try to throw light upon a phenomenon. Also, I will try posit my perspective about it.

To commence with, there are multifarious reason to shore this view. First and foremost reason is that people get diverted in wrong direction. For instance, advert of tobacco will affect negatively on consumer. With the help of advertisement, company stared to increase their income to sell their product without think about public health. Tobacco is injurious to health while people get addicted to consume tobacco or ciggarate due to advertisement because ad agency hire a many celebrities to promote that product, so people who follow that person and start to chew the tobacco. Hence people have to face some fatal diseases such as cancer. Government should ban this type of advertisement. Secondly, advertisement of junk food should also be forbidden. To prove, junk food may be unhygienic for people who consume that product, sometime they suffer from food poison. Some ad agency try to attract children for selling their product. As children get impressed by advert thus they pester their parents to buy that product. This may result in, parents have to tackle difficult situation of financial condition.

On the other side of spectrum, the main reason for advertisement should be directed without any hurdle is that people can get in touch that products and technology which are launched recently. So people can compare with other goods and can easily find that which is better for them for make convenient life. Another reason that increase the rate of unemployment. To be explained, if advertisement should be banned than people who work in that advert become jobless and without having any work they diverted to the crime and they become offender as well as crime rate will increase due to unemployment.

Aggelomerating, all points to conclude that advertisement has similar positive aspect as well as negative aspect. Advertisement is way, with the help of this government can aware the people about global warming and some other Serious problem.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...t person and start to chew the tobacco. Hence people have to face some fatal diseases...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 936, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...act children for selling their product. As children get impressed by advert thus t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, for instance, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1948.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22252010724 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84425259089 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536193029491 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 16.0721442886 149% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.4729507408 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.1666666667 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5416666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.29166666667 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108180485296 0.244688304435 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0305215264757 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032207506289 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749724330052 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180189036635 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.