In this growing generation, environmental problems have become one of the major issues facing every nation. It is the responsibility of every citizen and the national government to be concerned about their country's situation. I strongly disagree with the statement because, rather than international organizations, each nation's government holds more significance in solving environmental problems.
On the one hand, the government can bring about changes in protecting the environment by focusing on major issues like the prohibition of plastics and controlling garbage. It is undeniable that international organizations have better options and suggestions for controlling the issues, but they rarely reach every corner of the country. If the nation's government strictly controls the uses in plastics, then it will be beneficial for both living creatures of lands and seas.
On the other hand, issues like toxic air, which is created by human activities, can also be controlled. For instance, many scientists have proven that the ozone layer, which protects the earth from the direct entry of UV radiation, has become thin compared to past years and that these rays can harm us with serious diseases like cancer. This all happened due to human activities like pollution generated by old vehicles and large industries. If the laws focus on these criteria then it would not be a problem, they can control their nation from environmental problems. If these criteria can be covered by the government, then it will not be necessary to look at the nation through international organizations.
In conclusion, the nation's governments can control their land from being polluted rather than international programmers. I strongly believe that authority holds more significance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 321, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
... than international organizations, each nations government holds more significance in s...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 344, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ach every corner of the country. If the nations government strictly controls the uses i...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50735294118 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13656165747 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577205882353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.5032614388 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262226794135 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100415795914 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981464379702 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185165219488 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110249221138 0.056905535591 194% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.