some believe that sharing too much information ts too good regarding scientific research, business, and academics. others believe that only valuable and impotant information should be shared freely. discuss both views and give your opinion.
Sharing our thoughts and news of any kind of field is to be considered as an indispensable part of human being's life. It is well reckoned by the few civilization that every person should share each information of different field such as, business news, scientific research update or any study related news. However, others urged that we should share only consequential information to the populace. In my opinion, people have to spread merely useful update about any fields to others.
On the one hand, people said that giving too much information to others is nice thought. Firstly, numerous people share more than enough information of anything due to that few person cannot get proper things. To cite an example, In academic workshops, organizer, during his speech, gives countless information to the listeners. Therefore, they cannot grab the real and main idea of speech. There are several examples present around the globe. Secondly, pots of fields share their updates to the human beings before they conformed it. Consequently, they may face some pitfalls during their progress. To quote an example, Reliance company, one of the renowned industry of India, gave information about some products in advance then after they failed to launch that product. Hence, they faced many obstacle in organization. It can be considered as an epitome.
On the other hand, sharing only possible and fruitful information to the mankind is better idea. To be more specific, when someone spreads only needy information to the people then they can understand that particular update. To give an example, lots of hospitals give only required information regarding patients condition to their relatives. As a result, they prevent the relatives by overreacting and they can give their best treatment to the patients without any interference. In addition, many scientists share only useful news regarding their research freely to the public. To illustrate, NASA, a well knowned American research center, give just few and valuable information related to space research and they prevent name and fame also which can consider as a paragon.
In conclusion, spreading too much information is harmful for people. Nevertheless, it is indeed a good thought to share just valuable news in public.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'beings'' or 'being's'?
Suggestion: beings'; being's
...dered as an indispensable part of human beings life. It is well reckoned by the few ci...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 146, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun civilization seems to be countable; consider using: 'few civilizations'.
Suggestion: few civilizations
...beings life. It is well reckoned by the few civilization that every person should share each inf...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun person seems to be countable; consider using: 'few people', 'few persons'.
Suggestion: few people; few persons
...ugh information of anything due to that few person cannot get proper things. To cite an ex...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 792, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun obstacle seems to be countable; consider using: 'many obstacles'.
Suggestion: many obstacles
... launch that product. Hence, they faced many obstacle in organization. It can be considered a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1922.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29476584022 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78879056073 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.2390139269 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3636363636 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307550833148 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921775391841 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0672344397268 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200701125828 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0227605123331 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.