Some children have a natural ability to grasp foreign languages and for that reason, it should not be a mandatory subject in the academic curriculum. Do you agree or Disagree?
The opinion is divided into whether learning a non-indigenous language should not be compulsory in the school curriculum since some pupils are predisposed to learning different languages or not is heated abate among individuals. I favor placing the latter approach in schools' educational programs as a mandatory subject because of the enormous benefit of learning multiple languages at an early age.
It is common knowledge that it is much easier to learn a second language at an early age; young children are not confused by simultaneously introducing multiple languages. Not only they naturally navigate multilingual environments. The expert argues that acquiring a second language early in life primes the brain to learn other languages. Also, the communication skills that children learn early in life will be the foundation for their communication abilities and provide them additional job security and advancement opportunities in uncertain economic times; vital language skill is an asset that will promote a lifetime of effective communications. For instance, a doctor who can communicate with his or her patient in their native language is much more likely to diagnose them.
Additionally, communication in multiple languages is becoming critical in the increasingly integrated global business community. To prepare our nation's children to be the next generation of future entrepreneurs, doctors, scientists, or whatever influential job they choose, we must foster an environment from a young age that promotes multilingual learning. Through this, we are setting up ourselves and our children for growth, success, security, and, ultimately, prosperity.
The other reason is the cognitive benefits of learning a new language, which directly impacts children's academic achievement, compared to those without an additional language. Bilingual children learn faster and more comfortably, have improved problem-solving skills and creativity. They also find it easier to connect with other cultures, which make them more open-minded and tolerant of diversity, also show signs of enhanced creativity and mental flexibility; the result of a study which accomplished at Gail university indicated that the bilingual individuals are less likely to experiences age-related mental illness (such as dementia) as they reach old age.
In conclusion, according to the analysis mentioned above, concerning the question of whether language classes in schools should be obligatory or not, this argument seems to be accepted due to the numerous benefits these classes bring to children as well as the feasibility of the gradual demolition of the innate language-learning ability.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...he analysis mentioned above, concerning the question of whether language classes in schools should be o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2275.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 397.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73047858942 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25511374152 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589420654912 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 729.9 506.74238477 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.6389744753 49.4020404114 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.5 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3571428571 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203767671499 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0670052376279 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.036236153533 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107565292373 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345923887145 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.