Some people say that government should not put money into building theatres and sports stadium; they should focus on medical care and education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many individuals argue that authorities should emphasize constructing medical care and education more than public entertainment places like sports stadiums and theatres. In my opinion, I disagree entirely with this view, and I will explain more details in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, building some theatres or stadiums could positively benefit that particular community. For example, many job opportunities can be available during and after the construction, and people can conveniently join more sports-related activities or entertainment concerts. In addition, the health of individuals would promote as participating in social activity is a crucial aspect of people's needs, especially young people. Therefore, there is a lower risk of an unhealthy society. However, if Governments are trying to build those kinds of buildings more than the requirements, they will not contribute their budget to other sectors like health care or education. Consequently, people will not obtain proper health and education systems.
Secondly, there is no doubt that constructing a new theater and stadium play a significant role in the prosperity of a nation. It would give a substantial chance for hosting the celebrate national or international level competitions based on those infrastructures. As a result, the nation's benefits for hosting events include a boom in its economy through tourism and trade.
Taking everything into consideration, governments should balance their construction for their people. They have to think about profits and drawbacks before doing any projects like building schools or sports grounds. Otherwise, all the consequences will be suffered by their next generations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 176, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d give a substantial chance for hosting the celebrate national or international level competi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80478087649 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26032272795 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677290836653 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1913151562 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2142857143 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222418715323 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632207086964 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600884950099 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118200459937 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602923752254 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.06 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.