some children spend hours every day on their smartphones. Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
There are divided opinions when it comes to how children use their smartphones these days. Because of its magical utilities, the public, including kids, depends on it for almost all the usual activities. While some people contended that this is a good innovation of technology and for humans in general, I asserted that spending too much time on the Internet could have adverse effects on various aspects.
It is impossible to argue against the Internet and smartphone's benefits on a daily basis of human life. With the ability to access a vast range of knowledge, young generations can reach out and learn numerous courses. It is also easier to look up data on demands. The invention of smartphones is a vital step in communication between people and people. By taking full advantage of it, kids can connect immediately to their society in every case. For instance, it takes one second to send and receive a mail or messenger, much faster than snail-mails in the past, which have to wait for months.
On the other hand, using intelligent devices unwisely disclaims its function. Having proof and studies by numerous scientists that looking at a smart device’s screen for a long time would harm people’s health, especially our eyes. Moreover, spending hours on smartphones would reduce the time for outdoor activities, leading to weakening physical health. Some teenagers depend extensively on their phones to entertain recently and make light of caring for their families and friends.
In brief, multiple surveys illustrate that the number of minors with eye diseases because of interaction with smartphones is rising steadily. Despite good reasons, this always disadvantages people and children in particular.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, moreover, second, so, while, for instance, in brief, in general, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25724637681 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80089805789 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.655797101449 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.9092580978 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53333333333 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166115151258 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0503632446276 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494707919198 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965792719039 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234374918157 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.