The issue of whether or not governments should limit the traffic flow has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people claim that private cars should not be allowed to enter city centers while others do not agree. From my perspective, this constructive idea is utterly feasible albeit/despite some avoidable demerits.
Admittedly, the public cannot be oblivious of the drawbacks of banning cars from urban areas. One of the potential downsides is the devastating economic consequences. Implementation of car traffic restrictions will suspend the delivery of daily supplies to stores, forcing retailers to choose alternative but expensive ways to secure their supply chain, and this implies an increase in the cost of running their business. If there is a shortage of cash flow, there is great likelihood of ending their business, which in turn leads to a rise of unemployment and a rapid decline in economy. Nevertheless, this economic impact does not necessarily imply that cars should be denied access to urban areas.
In fact, creating a car-free city is conducive to the reduction of air pollution and the safety among residents and visitors. According to the data provided by the National Environmental Protection Organization, there has been a significant drop in the amount of carbon dioxide emissions after private cars are restricted access to the city center. In addition, local residents and pedestrians can walk on the road without any traffic threat because there is no traffic congestion. Even better, firefighters would not be concerned about being trapped in a traffic jam.
In conclusion, both of the views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that private vehicles should be prohibited from entering the city center, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest. Although allowing the private cars to enter central areas might have economic impacts on local businesses, our environment and safety are the last things that we can ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 14, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
The issue of whether or not governments should limit the traffic fl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1712.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25153374233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88491020901 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9838250251 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187274338201 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614300538427 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683609615037 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111562730987 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408007094305 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.91 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.